UTF-8 https://feraios.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
Google

Saturday, May 30, 2015

CYBERSECURITY IS A CRUCIAL ELEMENT TO OPEN THE GATES-PYLES FOR THE EUROPEAN CITIZENS LEADERSHIP

(BY CLICKING ON THE TITLE THE READER IS REDIRECTED TO AN INTERESTING ARTICLE ABOUT RUSSIA'S IDEAS)


POLITES,CITIZENS,METAPOLITANS *, CHAIRESTHAI,
AFTER ALMOST 8 YEARS OF HARD VOLUNTEER WORK,MAINLY INSIDE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION'S  TECHNICAL&SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEES,THE PLEASURE OF THE FULFILLMENT FOR SOME OF OUR PROPOSALS CONSULTATIONS AND STRATEGICAL DIRECTIONS ,CONCERNING THE MICRO AND INTERNAL POLICIES,JUSTIFIES THE RIGHT OF THE POLITICAL STANCE,THAT IT  IS KEPT, FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS.




THE STRATEGICAL APPROACH BY THE NEW COMMISSION'S ADMINISTRATION IS BASED ON EUROPEAN LEADERSHIP AND EUGENE COMPETITION WITH OTHER TERRITORIAL ZONES,SOMETHING ABOUT LIKE IT IS WRITTEN  AS A TITLE,AND IT WAS PROPOSED BY OUR POWERS TO LOTS OF MEETINGS INSIDE THE COMMISSION,DURING THOSE  PAST YEARS. 

ABOUT BIOTECHNOLOGY&BIO-MEDICINE
EUROPE BY FOLLOWING THE METALUCEAN POLITICS CAN BE A LEADER AGAIN


ABOUT COMMON DEFENSE&SECURITY
BUILDING A PAN-EUROPEAN DEFENSE SYSTEM (PART Z - OUR DEFENSE IS AN INTERNAL ISSUE)

ABOUT PARTICIPATORY,DIRECT DEMOCRACY
GREEN PAPER IN PUBLIC CONSULTATION - LETS GO ,LETS BUILD THE EUROPE OF PLURALISM AND CREATIVITY,THE EUROPE OF CITIZENS


EPAPHOS IS DEDICATED FOR THE EUROPEAN CITIZENS AND PARTNERS BENEFIT

STILL IT IS LEFT TO BE  FOLLOWED OUR PROPOSALS FOR THE :


EUROPEAN INTERNET (SYNNET),

AERONAUTICS&SPACE PRIVATE SECTOR,


THE PARTICIPATION OF THE STAKEHOLDERS ON THE DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES&PROCESSES,


THE INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC POLICIES,BASED ON PREFER-ISM,

THE INSTITUTION OF THE 10+1 EARTHEAN ZONES AND INDEPENDENT EUROPEAN EXTERNAL RELATIONS 








THE MAIN REASON ABOUT THE TODAY ARTICLE IS OUR PARTICIPATION ON BEHALF OF CITIZENS AND PRIVATE SECTOR INTO THE CYBER-SECURITY MEETINGS


ePAPHOS AT CYBERSECURITY&PRIVACY INNOVATION FORUM 2015   (29/05/15)

WHERE IT WAS DECLARED OUR STANCE FOR :

CREATING LEGISLATION IN ORDER CLOUD SERVERS TO BE INSIDE UNION'S BORDERS,FOR THOSE SERVERS WHICH ARE SERVING THE PUBLIC AND PERSONAL DATA.

THE  LOSS OF ALL OUR TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANTAGES DUE TO OUR PARTNERS&ALLIES  INNOVATIVE ABILITIES IN FINANCIAL SECTOR AND FREEDOM OF RESEARCH (SEE WHITE TECHNOLOGIES,NOKIA,SKYPE ETC)


THE NEED FOR OUR EUROPEAN INTERNET,THE SYNNET  

ON 28/05/15 WE PARTICIPATED TO

ePAPHOS AT 2nd HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE EU CYBERSECURITY

WHERE TO OUR SURPRISE AND I WANT TO BELIEVE FOR PURELY TECHNICAL REASONS, THE THIRD

TECHNICAL PANEL ,

MAKING THE EU AN INDUSTRIAL LEADER IN TRUSTWORTHY ICT,

DIDN'T GIVE THE CHANCE TO OUR PERSPECTIVE TO BE HEARD.


OUR COMMENTS LATER ON FOR THE EUROPEAN DEMOCRATIC WAYS HAVE TO BE IN CLOSE ATTENTION BY ALL CITIZENS SINCE THE  EUROPEAN  PAST - PRESENT AND FUTURE IS AND SHOULD BE BASED ON THESE VALUES.

IN ORDER OUR VOICE TO BE HEARD THE COMMENT IS GOING TO BE IN A WRITTEN FORM,EXPRESSED HERE,
BECAUSE PURE DEMOCRACY CANNOT BE STOPPED:

"GOOD EVENING CITIZENS,


THE VALUED  PANELISTS ARE GUIDING OUR THOUGHTS NEARER TO WHAT THE DISTINGUISHED CITIZEN AND COMMISSIONER FOR THE  DIGITAL  ECONOMY&SOCIETY HONORABLE MR.OETTINGER HAS REQUESTED FROM THE CYBER COMMUNITY

EUROPE TO TAKE THE LEADERSHIP IN THE DIGITAL WORLD

BUT GENERAL GUIDANCE ISN'T  ENOUGH AND HIS COMMAND NEEDS THE PROPERTY ON THE FIELD IN ORDER THIS TO BE ACHIEVED,OTHERWISE AS ONE OF THE PANELISTS HAS NOTICED THE LAST PRODUCT HAVING ITS ORIGIN FROM THE EUROPEAN LANDS IS VERY NEAR TO STOP ITS PRODUCTION.

OUR POLITICAL POINT OF VIEW IS  EXPRESSING THE FREE EUGENE COMPETITION,WITH OTHER TERRITORIAL EARTHEN ZONES(9 zones),ALLIES OR NOT,AS THE IDEA OF THE FREE MARKET IS PRESENTING.

THIS CAN'T BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT THE LEGAL AND TECHNICAL INSTITUTION OF THE EUROPEAN INTERNET ,THE SYNNET ,FROM THE FIRST UP TO THE  END POINTS.
THE INFRASTRUCTURES AND THE CAPITAL ARE EXISTING.
WHAT IT IS MISSING IS THE POLITICAL WILL IN ORDER TO BE INVESTED 10 MILLION EURO FOR A COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES ,CIVIL SOCIETY AND SMEs  IN  ORDER ,NEW PROTOCOLS AND TECHNICS TO BE IMPLEMENTED,NOT TO THE APPLICATION LAYERS LEVEL BUT TO THE HARD CORE OF THE SYSTEM.

THE LEADERS IN ORDER NOT TO MIGRATE TO OTHER COUNTRIES THEY NEED TO BE HEARD,TO BE GIVEN THE ABILITIES TO IMPLEMENT THEIR IDEAS,THEY NEED THE PLACES TO GROW AND HARVEST THEIR POLITICAL,SCIENTIFIC&
ECONOMIC FEELINGS,
OTHERWISE LIKE IT IS DONE TODAY THEY WILL DEPART FROM THE EUROPEAN AND MEDI LANDS.
BECAUSE DEAR COLLEAGUES,

EUROPE CANNOT BE A LEADER IF IT IS WORKING ON A FOREIGN PROPERTY ,LIKE THE INTERNET IS.
EUROPE CAN'T BE A LEADER IF THE GUARDIANS OF THE SYSTEM CANNOT ENTER WITH  DEMOCRATIC EUROPEAN PERMISSION INTO IT,THE FASTEST ,TO RESOLVE THE CYBER CRIME PROBLEMS .
EUROPE CANNOT BE A LEADER IF THE CITIZEN,DOESN'T FEEL THAT HIS DIGITAL DATA,AND LIFE ARE ON THE HANDS OF A CYBERSECURITY FELLOW LOCAL MAN. 


ALSO THE EVOLUTION OF THE SYSTEM,THROUGH  SEMANTICS-IoT-NEURONIC NETS,
TECHNOLOGIES,AUGMENTS THE PERSPECTIVE FOR A CENTRAL CONTROL ,FROM  THE PART OF  THE LEGAL (MILITARY) ADMINISTRATOR,WHEN THE SYNNET WILL CREATE A BRIDGED CIVILIAN COOPERATION ,BY

KEEPING THE INDEPENDENCE FOR THE PRIVACY AND SECURITY OF THE EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN CITIZENS,

AVOIDING MONOLITHIC&MONOCRATIC APPROACHES.

AND

BY AUGMENTING COOPERATION&TRADE COMPETITION THROUGH CONNECTED BRIDGED APPS LAYERS WITH THE INTERNET



THANKS ALL FOR YOUR ATTENTION AND SUPPORT

 A.C.






*IT IS LIKED TO BE MENTIONED THAT THE SALUTATION'S TERMINOLOGY IS CHANGING ,WITH THIS ONE WHICH IS CLOSER TO THE  PRINCIPLES  OF THE  ECOUMENIZATION THEORY . 




Labels:

Link

Monday, September 17, 2012

EUROPEANS:WE SHOULD BUILD THE SYN-NET ,our own internet (a)

The EUROPEAN  FUTURE INTERNET INITIATIVE
Position paper on the Core Platform needed to support the Future
Internet Projects

1 Motivation The European aspiration of creating the most competitive and dynamic knowledge economy and  rapidly raising standards of living must be based on the Future Internet being integrated in the  business processes of all industrial sectors with a special focus on helping new and innovative  SMEs and start-ups to succeed by providing a more flexible and less costly IT infrastructure and  SW. This will enable these sectors to be more efficient in terms of using resources, reductions of  emissions, improving their business processes and helping people.
To achieve this, there is a need to confront, understand and support the expectations and
requirements of the different sectors in order to deliver a common, standardized, efficient Internet.
This challenge requires bringing together the competence of the application sectors (Usage Areas) and the ICT sector to work out common solutions from an end-to-end perspective. This entails a  multidisciplinary and integrated approach, where massively distributed services and applications  are run over large scale and secure internet platforms. This is the only adequate way to deal  effectively with the increasing complexity of intertwined application and service demands and still  ensure compatibility and interoperability of the solutions.
image
The EFII has analysed a number of representative “Usage Areas” and determined sets of
applications that may share common domain expertise, technological and services requirements so  that they can, in turn, share framework, technologies, generic common enablers and architectures  in the provision of working systems.
This concept of maximum commonality across application sectors is crucial to facilitate the creation  of a critical mass for advanced services and the creation of European-scale markets for smart  infrastructures, with integrated advanced communications functionalities.
Hence, The EFFI is proposing to develop and deploy a platform that instantiates a unified and consolidated open architectural approach that globally enables the creation, deployment and  execution of applications by using hardware, software, network enabling capabilities etc. This is  what we refer to as the Future Internet Core Platform.
image
2 Overall Approach and Rationale
The Future Internet must be based on shared frameworks, technologies, common enablers and  architectural principles. These will be defined through the Future Internet Core Platform (FI-CP)  concept. This is built on the need to evolve from a set of communication-centric, content-centric,service-centric, resource-centric isolated infrastructures to a polymorphic infrastructure, where the  boundaries between systems are more flexible and allow blending, and where the emphasis is on  the integration, interrelationships and interworking of their elements through new service-based  interfaces
image
Future Internet enabled Applications will typically be built on top of Future Internet Core Platform  Instances (FI-CPI). A set of Generic Enablers is provided with the aim of building such instances in  an easy and affordable way, and with the intent to support sharing of the same architectural  principles across all instances, enabling interoperability between applications running on top of  different instances.
Generic Enablers, selected for a given platform instance, are configured and “glued” together to  provide an appropriate set of functionality. Future Internet Application Providers can use standard  interfaces provided by such a Platform to deploy and monitor the type of applications for which the  platform was designed.
The benefits of such an approach would be to:
• Analyse and classify the needs from Usage Areas and identify commonalities
• Define open interfaces between enablers and assembled functions
• Develop or integrate functionalities which meet the needs of Usage Areas according to a
sound methodology
image
Such a Future Internet Core Platform would not be built from scratch but would be assembled on
an iterative basis to meet design specifications coming from Usage Areas. This assembly will also
make use of existing results coming from various Framework Programmes, National Initiatives or
companies´ internal developments.
3 The Core Platform Architecture
3.1 Basic Architectural Principles
The Future Internet Core Platform provides the means to support many different applications and  business processes, which may have different requirements on the Core Platform capabilities.
Therefore, different instances of the Core Platform can be established comprising different Generic  Enablers (GEs). However all instances should adhere to a common architecture and some basic  architectural principles.
Each Future Internet Core Platform Instance will be created based on the combination of a number  of the Generic Enablers defined above, targeted to cover the needs of Future Internet Applications.
These GEs should be designed to support interoperability of applications as well as portability of   a given application across alternative implementations of the supporting FI-CPI and allow the  evolution and adaptation of the each FI-CP and FI-CPIs to the changing needs of the Usage Area  and the new advancements in the state of the art.
Portability and Interoperability  Enablers available for the creation of FI-CPIs will provide open interfaces that applications will  employ in order to benefit from the Core Platform services and functionality. They may also require  that applications provide some data in compliance with some metadata definitions. Therefore,
• A common communication model will be defined based on the requirements of the usage
areas (e. g. Quality of Experience, mobility and security issues) and operational constraints
following the next generation network architecture (data control, management plane).
• A unified set of interface specifications – based on the communication model and where
needed and appropriate- should be defined that will be adopted by all GEs and FI-CPIs.
• Interfaces must be invoked in a standard manner to ensure a sound model and a coherent  usage of enablers.
• Open standard metadata specifications have to be defined for all those pieces where
standardization of metadata will be required to support portability and interoperability (e.g.,service specifications to be used during marketplace registration)
In order to meet its objectives, the FI-CP will have to address this issue in a pragmatic way, selecting and promoting those solutions that best solve the requirements coming from the usage  areas and minimizing fragmentation in terms of the GEs implementation and integration. Service  orientation, Web oriented architectures, REST vs. WS-*, commonly accepted ontologies and XML  standards, new solutions proposed by many parties like USDL will all be analysed and adopted  where appropriate.
Evolution and adaptability
A FI-CPI can be considered as a composition of enablers into a platform that supports a particular  family of smart FI applications and services. This composition evolves over time, i.e. enablers can  be added, removed, reconfigured, and managed in a continuous platform life-cycle. From an  engineering perspective the focus must therefore be put on supporting the controlled evolution and  change of FI-CPIs over time.
4 What will the Core Platform Offer – Initional Set of GEs To tackle the provision of services at a global scale, FI-CPIs might support the following principles at global level:
• Accessibility: Every entity in the Future Internet must be made accessible anywhere-anytime.
This is related to ubiquitous connectivity.
• Identification and Naming: Every entity in the FI must be uniquely identifiable.
• Run-time explorability: Every entity in the FI must be self-describing. This is essential to allow  the exploration of entities at run-time – not only at design time.
• Data: All data exchanged between applications must be self-describing.
• Trustworthiness customization: every entity must be able to adjust or to expose adjustment  rules regarding security, privacy, integrity, compliancy and certification aspects based on the  interactions in which it operate at run-time in a global level
• Non-Functional Aspects: Elementary non-functional aspects such as quality, governance,
accountability, resilience, availability, and integrity must be properly supported in various
degrees by entities in the FI globally.
The FI Generic Enablers Development activity will focus on how the above core platform objectives  can be implemented my means of a core set of Generic Enablers. The architectures, interfaces and  information flows will also be defined to allow these GEs to be developed, integrated and managed  to create FI-CPIs. The intention is to standardise the interfaces to encourage global take up of the  results of this initiative.
The identification of the highest priority Generic Enablers in accordance with the overall goals and  objectives of building the Core Platform will be based on which enablers can support the most  generic sector requirements. Obviously the enablers that are critical to all sectors will be highest  priority.
The iterative exercise to identify, define and characterize the generic enablers is already taking  place. The emphasis is to selecting a realistic set of Enablers and to find pragmatic ways to  implement them in the given time frame. Use of available results from previous research work is  part of the strategy.
The following sections provide more detailed information about the overall vision and motivation  behind some of the Generic Enablers identified so far.
4.1 End-user access, adaptation and composition of Resources This GE encompasses specific enablers responsible for empowering users in the usage and
adaptation of the different available resources. By resources, we mean any end user valuable  software or content, that is data sources (RSS, OpenData, web contents…), Services (WS*, REST,IMS, Telco Services, … ) or Applications (Web Clients, Gadgets,… )
In other words, the ultimate goal of this GE is to offer the necessary technologies to allow endusers  to access and adapt every resource to any delivery context, situation and process, taking into  account a wide range of scenarios covering any daily-life common tasks and the fusions of roles  users take at any moment and any place (work,entertainment, family, home etc.)  End-users of any application must be able to act as prosumers, creating new content and  applications and sharing their knowledge in well controlled crowd-sourcing environments.
Technologies that empower end users to create and compose new resources by means of lowering  as much as possible the technological barriers will be developed and integrated in this GE. At this  moment Mash-up technologies applied to Data, Services and Applications are the best candidates  to fulfill this need.
Moreover autonomous helpers are desired, able to solve generic issues that could appear during  the creation or exploitation phase, such as context awareness, including but not limited to delivery  context (device, network etc.), user context (identity, preferences, profile role, and social  information), environment context (location, sensor information, “things” offering information or  services etc.) or situation (time, date, season, at home or at work, on vacation, on a business trip,mood etc.)
4.2 Service Handling and SOA Support This GE will encompass components in charge of providing all the basic services required for a  next generation SOA approach, where all computing and networking infrastructure resources, IoT  elements, devices, SW functionality etc. are encapsulated and handled and offered as services, both internally within the platform and externally to the Usage areas.
Representative functionalities offered by this GE are (among other possible candidates):
• Uniform naming resolution for any Entity in the platform (services, things, devices, nodes, resources, etc.) that supports both public and private spaces, together with the ability to  handle large number of entities (millions)
• An efficient, scalable and distributed Service Repository that will also support management  and federation of various domains (public and private repositories).
• A common Application Communication Infrastructure that supports multiple paradigms,
such as request/response, publish/subscribe, multicast, etc., as well as transactional
properties.
• Meta-data indexing and inference to enable Entity/Service Indexing, Searching and
discovery
• Modelling, Composition, orchestration and execution of business processes and telco
services
4.3 Event and Data Management and Processing
This category will encompass all those enablers whose functions are related to handling,
composing, transforming, classifying and, in general terms, managing all kind of data and events:
• Event / data aggregation, correlation and filtering -This enabler will allow the aggregation
and hierarchical handling of data and events (e.g. event filtering and aggregation at
different levels).
• Event Transformation – This enabler deals with the inference of new events and/or
semantics; application of syntactic pre-processing etc. Real-time and data mashups will
also be elements related to this enabler.
• Data classification - Functions such as processing data, clustering and usage of semantics
on classification are provided by this Generic Enabler.
4.4 Multimedia analysis and semantic support 4.4.1 Multimedia analysis
We live in a multimedia world, where we daily interact with both professionally and user-generated  content. In particular, the amount of user-generated multimedia content has increased  exponentially in recent years, creating new challenges in multimedia analysis and the pervasive  problem of digital media overload, where users have a very hard time finding desired content in  their ever increasing repositories of personal media. In addition, an increasing amount of  multimedia content is stored in the ‘cloud’, thanks to pervasive Internet broadband access and a  steady reduction of storage costs.
In this scenario, new multi-modal approaches to multimedia analysis are needed, including novel  methodologies to fuse multi-modal multimedia content with its associated contextual information  (e.g. location, metadata, tags, user feedback, etc…). Automatic tagging techniques and innovative  interfaces to encourage users to add context to their content will enrich the multimedia information  and improve the results of multimedia search engines while, at the same time, increase the  knowledge about the users and hence enable personalization and recommendations (discovery of  new and relevant multimedia content). Given that most of the multimedia content is (and will  be) user generated, there are additional challenges that need to be tackled when building  multimedia management systems, including: efficient near-duplicate image and video copy  detection; algorithms and user interfaces for multi-modal multimedia summarization; computational
models of the aesthetic value of multimedia content (increasingly important due to the large  variance in the quality of user-generated content); and novel ways to create rich multimodal user  experiences by experimenting with new paradigms of consuming multimedia.
Another aspect that can mark a significant evolution is the analysis of Digital Footprint - large-scale  human behavioural data. With this challenge we refer to capture, storage, visualize and analyze  large-scale multi-modal data coming from different source: Internet of Things, sensors, social  networks, mobile users geo-location, etc. From these data and with new algorithms for inferring  and predict human behaviour, CP can offer valuable information for building smarter applications in  all the usage areas.
The Core Platform will need to provide algorithms for multimedia content analysis that would tackle  the previously stated challenges, enabling content filtering and aggregation at different levels,personalization and creating unique user experiences suited to the needs of its users.
4.4.2 Semantic Support
One of its most outstanding characteristics of FI applications will be their capability to understand  the meaning of the information exposed or interchanged. This capability, which will be provided by  the so called Semantic Technologies, will make it possible to build a more human Internet, diluting  the current communication barriers between software systems and their users, as well as more  intelligent applications we are not even able to imagine nowadays. In this sense, Semantic  Technologies will revolutionize Internet as we know it today.
To be aligned with the previous statement and predictions, the Platform will need to include these  semantic capabilities from the core so that any other additional feature to be included in the  Platform directly benefits from them. These semantic capabilities will include not only mechanisms  to generate the semantic information, including mechanisms to automatically extract meaning from  already existent content as well as manual mechanisms to involve the final users in the semantic  annotation of the information they manage, but also mechanisms to store and to exploit the  semantic information available.
4.5 Preferences, profiling and context
The society is evolving to a more and more such a heterogeneous ecosystem: in order to cover all  the needs and provide goods and services customer-tailored, the knowledge of users’ environment  and preferences is a key factor. In this way it aill be possible to satisfying demand‘s diversity and  creating new business opportunities.
This enabler collects big amount of data from users’ activity and after applying ETL process and  specific Analytic Models, it infers information about users like users’ age, mobility patters, tastes,social interaction, etc. This valuable information is an input to the Recommendation Engine  together with contents provided by external suppliers. The results of these recommendations are  provided to services and applications located in the Usage Area.
Profiling allows services and content to be tailored automatically to the end-user's preferences (e.g.content consumption in the past) as well as the user's context (location, current connectivity, mood,etc…). Personalization is not just limited to on-demand TV, video or music, but also for life experiences like social interaction, education, leisure, shopping, etc.
The Context Awareness is much more than location awareness alone, or merely the immediate  situation. The vision is to have a middleware infrastructure capable of collecting all user’s context  information from devices, sensors, database and from the environment in general, in order to  decide what is worth for the user depending on her/his preferences and instantaneous state.
Privacy policy will be implemented for retrieving and analyze users’ information.
Main objectives of this working work would be to define (among others):
• A platform independent & distributed approach encompassing all types of services.
• A support infrastructure that is aware of the user’s situation (location-based information,
mood, etc.).
• Analytic algorithms for modelling users’ behaviour based on SNA technologies, Neural
Networks, etc.
• A recommendation engine supported by a Personalisation Engine as common enablers for
services and applications deployed in the Usage Areas.
• Additional mechanisms for managing users’ privacy and controls the information they
desire to provide to the platform, preserving rest of data.
4.6 Identity, Privacy, Confidentiality
Creating trustworthy and secure applications that provide at the same time an appropriate end-user  experience will greatly depend on the FI-CP offering a shared framework that will span  applications, services and enablers, giving easy and uniform access to authorization, authentication and identification features.
Under this initial perspective, advanced functionalities must be provided to solve issues like account management, single sign on, federation, profile and personal context sharing in social  environments, establishment of privacy and access policies. A common Identity management  architecture will improve the integration of all the core platform enablers, helping in the "one  platform" user perception. A common identity management framework should also be responsible of handling privacy constrains and all kind of legal issues related to personal data protection.
Convergence of IT standards and technologies and in this area with exist Telco capabilities (SIM  Cards, trusted connections between devices and network, established trust relationships with end  users etc.) will also be a focus of the work, in order to achieve the best possible compromise  between security and user experience.
(TO BE CONTINUED)
source  EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Labels:

Saturday, April 14, 2012

THE OLIGARCHIES ARE PROCEEDING TO IMPLEMENTING THEIR ARISTOCRATIC PLANS,AGAINST DEMOCRACIES

(CLICKING ON THE TITLED LINK WE CAN READ LEMONDE'S ARTICLE  reveillez-vous-la-democratie-recule )

CITIZENS CHAIRESTHAI(=BE HAPPY),
IT IS STUDIED AND OBSERVED DURING OUR RESEARCH WORK THAT THE GLOBAL OLIGARCHY AND ITS BASE AT N.Y. CONTINUES  TO STRIVE AGAINST CIVIL LIBERTIES ,BECAUSE THEIR REPRESENTATIVES  UNDERSTAND THAT THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM WHICH WAS CREATED BY THEM AT THE BEGINNING OF 20TH CENTURY, EITHER CAPITALISTIC OR COMMUNISTIC(ANY FORMS OF DICTATORSHIPS ARE USED AS MEDIUM  EQUILIBRIUM PROCESSES ) ,IT IS REVEALED.
THEY ARE AFRAID THAT ALL THE  FRAUDS AND FAKE SYNERGIES WILL BE PRESENTED  TO THE PUBLIC,AS LATELY IT IS PARTIALLY HAPPENING AND BY THIS THEIR INJUSTICE GOVERNANCE ,TO WHICH  ALMOST  ALL THE NOMENCLATURE PARTY MEMBERS FOR THE MAJOR  GLOBAL  NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS  ARE  BEING INVOLVED ,WILL BE  UNCOVERED,WITH THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES,WHICH WILL FOLLOW.

THE COMMUNISTIC REGIMES WHICH  COLLAPSED SOME YEARS AGO,WERE ONE PART OF THE WHOLE SYSTEM'S  DESTABILIZATION,DUE TO ITS WEAK POINTS .
NOW THE OTHER PART  OF IT ,WITHOUT  ITS NATURAL OPPONENT AND BALANCING POLE ,IT  IS COLLAPSING TOO.

THOSE POWERS WHICH PREPARED AND ORGANIZED THE FUNCTIONS OF  THESE TWO SYSTEMS AS IT IS WRITTEN TO THE ECOUMENICAL ESSAY OF OURS AND NOT ONLY ,DURING 18-19th AD ,ARE TAKING SEVERE AUSTERITY MEASURES IN ORDER TO CONTROL THEIR HUGE INHUMAN MISTAKES.DEMOCRACY AS AN INSTITUTION IT IS ENDANGERED AND  COVERED DICTATORSHIP ACTIVITIES, ACTIONS ARE TAKING PLACE ALMOST EVERYWHERE,BUT MAINLY IN EUROPE THE MOTHERLAND OF DEMOCRACY.

THESE ACTIONS CANNOT  BE HIDDEN ANY MORE,AS THE PURPOSES OF THE  ARISTOCRATIC-OLIGARCHIC  CYCLES  ARE KNOWN TO THE SOCIETIES.
THE AUSTERE  CONTROL OF THE POPULATION BY DIMINISHING THE  CITIZENS RIGHTS INSIDE THEIR REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM,WON'T OFFER ANY POSITIVE RESULTS .ON THE CONTRARY  PROCEEDING TO THE DIRECT DEMOCRATIC WITH  SORTING PROCEDURES  IMPLEMENTATION WILL AUGMENT CITIZENS PARTICIPATION SO THAT THE  ECONOMIC LIFE WILL TAKE A BREATH AND WILL  REBIRTH.

THE BELOW PUBLISHED ARTICLES ARE INDICATING,COMBINED WITH RELEVANT PREVIOUS POSTS,THE MENTIONED HERE POINTS.
WE HAVE ADVISED DURING SEVERAL EUROPEAN  SCIENTIFIC SUMMITS ,AT VARIOUS FIELDS,THE NEED FOR THE CREATION OF A COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE  STRATEGY,INSTEAD ON TAKING  ONLY MONOLITHIC ECONOMICAL MEASURES,AGAINST THE WEAK AND POOR.
IT ISN'T ACCEPTABLE THAT THE EUROPEAN CITIZENS DATA ,FOR ANY REASON SHOULD BE SHARED WITH OTHER NATIONS AND STATES DIRECTLY,INSTEAD  FROM A BALANCED AND EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL   COOPERATION BETWEEN
GOVERNMENTAL SECURITY BODIES,ONLY FOR SPECIAL SENSITIVE CASES,WHICH ARE VOTED  BY THE CITIZENS TO BE SO (AS AN EXAMPLE IT MIGHT BE TAKEN  THE LATEST TAX AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUSTRIA-HELVETIA WHICH NEEDS THE APPROVAL OF SWISS CITIZENS  LOCAL ASSEMBLIES,IN ORDER TO BE EFFECTIVE).
IT IS BELIEVED THAT WE THE EUROPEAN CITIZENS WE TRUST OUR DATA ,FOR BEING HANDLED  BY OUR SECURITY INSTITUTIONS,BUT NOT BY  THE FOREIGNERS.

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION AND SUPPORT
A.C.

Passenger data-sharing deal to be approved

MEPs to back controversial deal with the US.
The European Parliament is expected to approve next week a controversial agreement with the United States on the transfer of airline passengers' data.The agreement will be put to a vote of the plenary on 19 April, after a debate that morning.
A vote in the Parliament's committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs on 27 March suggested that of the five major political groups, only the Liberals and the Greens are firm in their opposition to the deal. The centre-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group, the second-largest in Parliament, is divided, while the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), the Parliament's largest, and the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) are in favour. The committee voted 31 to 23 in favour of the passenger name record (PNR) agreement, with one abstention.

Serious crimes

The PNR agreement gives the US authorities access to names, addresses, credit card numbers and similar information from European airline passengers. Under the new agreement, which is to replace a deal from 2007 that is currently in provisional application, this information can be used only in investigations of terrorist or other serious crimes. The agreement provides a range of safeguards, for example the requirement to render the data anonymous after six months.
The Obama administration has made it clear that it is not prepared to re-negotiate the agreement. A ‘No' vote by MEPs would therefore mean a return to legal uncertainty, since the US would still demand PNR from airlines, and airlines would feel compelled to oblige.
Many MEPs appeared convinced by the argument put forward by Cecilia Malmström, the European commissioner for home affairs, that the new agreement is the best available option.

By Toby Vogel 
SOURCE  http://www.europeanvoice.com



Britain set for sweeping Internet, phone monitoring

Britain is to allow one of its intelligence agencies to monitor all phone calls, texts, emails and online activities in the country to help tackle crime and militant attacks, the Interior Ministry said on Sunday.
"It is vital that police and security services are able to obtain communications data in certain circumstances to investigate serious crime and terrorism and to protect the public," a Home Office spokesman said.

The proposed law already has drawn strong criticism, from within the ruling Conservative Party's own ranks, as an invasion of privacy and personal rights.

"What the government hasn't explained is precisely why they intend to eavesdrop on all of us without even going to a judge for a warrant, which is what always used to happen," Member of Parliament David Davis told BBC News.

"It is an unnecessary extension of the ability of the state to snoop on ordinary people," he said.

New legislation is expected to be announced in the legislative agenda-setting speech given by the queen in May.

Currently, British agencies can monitor calls and e-mails of specific individuals who may be under investigation after obtaining ministerial approval, but expanding that to all citizens is certain to enrage civil liberties campaigners.

Internet companies would be required to install hardware which would allow the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), referred to as Britain's electronic 'listening' agency, to gain real-time access to communications data.

The new law would not allow GCHQ to access the content of emails, calls or messages without a warrant, but it would allow it to trace who an individual or group was in contact with, how frequently they communicated and for how long.

The Sunday Times newspaper, which first reported the story, said some details of the proposals were given to members of the Britain's Internet Service Providers' Association last month.

"As set out in the Strategic Defence and Security Review we will legislate as soon as parliamentary time allows to ensure that the use of communications data is compatible with the government's approach to civil liberties," the Home Office spokesman said.

Any proposed legislation changes are likely to face stiff opposition in both houses of the British Parliament.

A similar proposal was considered by the then-ruling Labour party in 2006 but was abandoned in the face of fierce opposition by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, who are junior partners in the ruling coalition.

The proposed legislation could reflect the U.S. Patriot Act, controversially introduced six weeks after September 11 in 2001, to expand the government's authority to monitor the communications activity of its citizens.

(Reporting by Stephen Mangan; Editing by Michael Roddy)

SOURCE  http://www.reuters.com






The Large Families that rule the world     

Some people have started realizing that there are large financial groups that dominate the world. Forget the political intrigues, conflicts, revolutions and wars. It is not pure chance. Everything has been planned for a long time.
Some call it “conspiracy theories” or New World Order. Anyway, the key to understanding the current political and economic events is a restricted core of families who have accumulated more wealth and power.
We are speaking of 6, 8 or maybe 12 families who truly dominate the world. Know that it is a mystery difficult to unravel.
We will not be far from the truth by citing Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Loebs Kuh and Lehmans in New York, the Rothschilds of Paris and London, the Warburgs of Hamburg, Paris and Lazards Israel Moses Seifs Rome.
Many people have heard of the Bilderberg Group, Illuminati or the Trilateral Commission. But what are the names of the families who run the world and have control of states and international organizations like the UN, NATO or the IMF?
To try to answer this question, we can start with the easiest: inventory, the world’s largest banks, and see who the shareholders are and who make the decisions.
The world’s largest companies are now: Bank of America, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.Let us now review who their shareholders are.
Bank of America:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, FMR (Fidelity), Paulson, JP Morgan, T. Rowe, Capital World Investors, AXA, Bank of NY, Mellon.
JP Morgan:
State Street Corp., Vanguard Group, FMR, BlackRock, T. Rowe, AXA, Capital World Investor, Capital Research Global
Investor, Northern Trust Corp. and Bank of Mellon.
Citigroup:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Paulson, FMR, Capital World Investor, JP Morgan, Northern Trust Corporation, Fairhome Capital Mgmt and Bank of NY Mellon.
Wells Fargo:
Berkshire Hathaway, FMR, State Street, Vanguard Group, Capital World Investors, BlackRock, Wellington Mgmt, AXA, T. Rowe and Davis Selected Advisers.
We can see that now there appears to be a nucleus present in all banks: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock and FMR (Fidelity). To avoid repeating them, we will now call them the “big four”
Goldman Sachs:
“The big four,” Wellington, Capital World Investors, AXA, Massachusetts Financial Service and T. Rowe.
Morgan Stanley:
“The big four,” Mitsubishi UFJ, Franklin Resources, AXA, T. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon e Jennison Associates. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon and Jennison Associates.
We can just about always verify the names of major shareholders. To go further, we can now try to find out the shareholders of these companies and shareholders of major banks worldwide.
Bank of NY Mellon:
Davis Selected, Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Dodge, Cox, Southeatern Asset Mgmt. and … “The big four.”
State Street Corporation (one of the “big four”):
Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Barrow Hanley, GE, Putnam Investment and … The “big four” (shareholders themselves!).
BlackRock (another of the “big four”):
PNC, Barclays e CIC.
Who is behind the PNC? FMR (Fidelity), BlackRock, State Street, etc.
And behind Barclays? BlackRock
And we could go on for hours, passing by tax havens in the Cayman Islands, Monaco or the legal domicile of Shell companies in Liechtenstein. A network where companies are always the same, but never a name of a family.
In short: the eight largest U.S. financial companies (JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan Stanley) are 100% controlled by ten shareholders and we have four companies always present in all decisions: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity.
In addition, the Federal Reserve is comprised of 12 banks, represented by a board of seven people, which comprises
representatives of the “big four,” which in turn are present in all other entities.
In short, the Federal Reserve is controlled by four large private companies: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity. These companies control U.S. monetary policy (and world) without any control or “democratic” choice. These companies launched and participated in the current worldwide economic crisis and managed to become even more enriched.
To finish, a look at some of the companies controlled by this “big four” group
  • Alcoa Inc.
  • Altria Group Inc.
  • American International Group Inc.
  • AT&T Inc.
  • Boeing Co.
  • Caterpillar Inc.
  • Coca-Cola Co.
  • DuPont & Co.
  • Exxon Mobil Corp.
  • General Electric Co.
  • General Motors Corporation
  • Hewlett-Packard Co.
  • Home Depot Inc.
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • Intel Corp.
  • International Business Machines Corp
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • JP Morgan Chase & Co.
  • McDonald’s Corp.
  • Merck & Co. Inc.
  • Microsoft Corp.
  • 3M Co.
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Procter & Gamble Co.
  • United Technologies Corp.
  • Verizon Communications Inc.
  • Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
  • Time Warner
  • Walt Disney
  • Viacom
  • Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation.,
  • CBS Corporation
  • NBC Universal
The same “big four” control the vast majority of European companies counted on the stock exchange.
In addition, all these people run the large financial institutions, such as the IMF, the European Central Bank or the World Bank, and were “trained” and remain “employees” of the “big four” that formed them.
The names of the families that control the “big four”, never appear.
Translated from the Portuguese version by:
Lisa Karpova
Pravda.Ru

Labels:

Link