CITIZENS CHAIRESTHAI(=BE HAPPY),
IT IS STUDIED AND OBSERVED DURING OUR RESEARCH WORK THAT THE GLOBAL OLIGARCHY AND ITS BASE AT N.Y. CONTINUES TO STRIVE AGAINST CIVIL LIBERTIES ,BECAUSE THEIR REPRESENTATIVES UNDERSTAND THAT THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM WHICH WAS CREATED BY THEM AT THE BEGINNING OF 20TH CENTURY, EITHER CAPITALISTIC OR COMMUNISTIC(ANY FORMS OF DICTATORSHIPS ARE USED AS MEDIUM EQUILIBRIUM PROCESSES ) ,IT IS REVEALED.
THEY ARE AFRAID THAT ALL THE FRAUDS AND FAKE SYNERGIES WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC,AS LATELY IT IS PARTIALLY HAPPENING AND BY THIS THEIR INJUSTICE GOVERNANCE ,TO WHICH ALMOST ALL THE NOMENCLATURE PARTY MEMBERS FOR THE MAJOR GLOBAL NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS ARE BEING INVOLVED ,WILL BE UNCOVERED,WITH THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES,WHICH WILL FOLLOW.
THE COMMUNISTIC REGIMES WHICH COLLAPSED SOME YEARS AGO,WERE ONE PART OF THE WHOLE SYSTEM'S DESTABILIZATION,DUE TO ITS WEAK POINTS .
NOW THE OTHER PART OF IT ,WITHOUT ITS NATURAL OPPONENT AND BALANCING POLE ,IT IS COLLAPSING TOO.
THOSE POWERS WHICH PREPARED AND ORGANIZED THE FUNCTIONS OF THESE TWO SYSTEMS AS IT IS WRITTEN TO THE ECOUMENICAL ESSAY OF OURS AND NOT ONLY ,DURING 18-19th AD ,ARE TAKING SEVERE AUSTERITY MEASURES IN ORDER TO CONTROL THEIR HUGE INHUMAN MISTAKES.DEMOCRACY AS AN INSTITUTION IT IS ENDANGERED AND COVERED DICTATORSHIP ACTIVITIES, ACTIONS ARE TAKING PLACE ALMOST EVERYWHERE,BUT MAINLY IN EUROPE THE MOTHERLAND OF DEMOCRACY.
THESE ACTIONS CANNOT BE HIDDEN ANY MORE,AS THE PURPOSES OF THE ARISTOCRATIC-OLIGARCHIC CYCLES ARE KNOWN TO THE SOCIETIES.
THE AUSTERE CONTROL OF THE POPULATION BY DIMINISHING THE CITIZENS RIGHTS INSIDE THEIR REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM,WON'T OFFER ANY POSITIVE RESULTS .ON THE CONTRARY PROCEEDING TO THE DIRECT DEMOCRATIC WITH SORTING PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTATION WILL AUGMENT CITIZENS PARTICIPATION SO THAT THE ECONOMIC LIFE WILL TAKE A BREATH AND WILL REBIRTH.
THE BELOW PUBLISHED ARTICLES ARE INDICATING,COMBINED WITH RELEVANT PREVIOUS POSTS,THE MENTIONED HERE POINTS.
WE HAVE ADVISED DURING SEVERAL EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC SUMMITS ,AT VARIOUS FIELDS,THE NEED FOR THE CREATION OF A COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE STRATEGY,INSTEAD ON TAKING ONLY MONOLITHIC ECONOMICAL MEASURES,AGAINST THE WEAK AND POOR.
IT ISN'T ACCEPTABLE THAT THE EUROPEAN CITIZENS DATA ,FOR ANY REASON SHOULD BE SHARED WITH OTHER NATIONS AND STATES DIRECTLY,INSTEAD FROM A BALANCED AND EQUAL TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION BETWEEN
GOVERNMENTAL SECURITY BODIES,ONLY FOR SPECIAL SENSITIVE CASES,WHICH ARE VOTED BY THE CITIZENS TO BE SO (AS AN EXAMPLE IT MIGHT BE TAKEN THE LATEST TAX AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUSTRIA-HELVETIA WHICH NEEDS THE APPROVAL OF SWISS CITIZENS LOCAL ASSEMBLIES,IN ORDER TO BE EFFECTIVE).
IT IS BELIEVED THAT WE THE EUROPEAN CITIZENS WE TRUST OUR DATA ,FOR BEING HANDLED BY OUR SECURITY INSTITUTIONS,BUT NOT BY THE FOREIGNERS.
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION AND SUPPORT
A.C.
Passenger data-sharing deal to be approved
MEPs to back controversial deal with the US.
The European Parliament is expected to approve next week a controversial agreement with the United States on the transfer of airline passengers' data.The agreement will be put to a vote of the plenary on 19 April, after a debate that morning.
A vote in the Parliament's committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs on 27 March suggested that of the five major political groups, only the Liberals and the Greens are firm in their opposition to the deal. The centre-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group, the second-largest in Parliament, is divided, while the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), the Parliament's largest, and the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) are in favour. The committee voted 31 to 23 in favour of the passenger name record (PNR) agreement, with one abstention.
The Obama administration has made it clear that it is not prepared to re-negotiate the agreement. A ‘No' vote by MEPs would therefore mean a return to legal uncertainty, since the US would still demand PNR from airlines, and airlines would feel compelled to oblige.
Many MEPs appeared convinced by the argument put forward by Cecilia Malmström, the European commissioner for home affairs, that the new agreement is the best available option.
By Toby Vogel
SOURCE http://www.europeanvoice.com
Britain set for sweeping Internet, phone monitoring
Britain is to allow one of its intelligence agencies to monitor all phone calls, texts, emails and online activities in the country to help tackle crime and militant attacks, the Interior Ministry said on Sunday.
"It is vital that police and security services are able to obtain communications data in certain circumstances to investigate serious crime and terrorism and to protect the public," a Home Office spokesman said.
The proposed law already has drawn strong criticism, from within the ruling Conservative Party's own ranks, as an invasion of privacy and personal rights.
"What the government hasn't explained is precisely why they intend to eavesdrop on all of us without even going to a judge for a warrant, which is what always used to happen," Member of Parliament David Davis told BBC News.
"It is an unnecessary extension of the ability of the state to snoop on ordinary people," he said.
New legislation is expected to be announced in the legislative agenda-setting speech given by the queen in May.
Currently, British agencies can monitor calls and e-mails of specific individuals who may be under investigation after obtaining ministerial approval, but expanding that to all citizens is certain to enrage civil liberties campaigners.
Internet companies would be required to install hardware which would allow the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), referred to as Britain's electronic 'listening' agency, to gain real-time access to communications data.
The new law would not allow GCHQ to access the content of emails, calls or messages without a warrant, but it would allow it to trace who an individual or group was in contact with, how frequently they communicated and for how long.
The Sunday Times newspaper, which first reported the story, said some details of the proposals were given to members of the Britain's Internet Service Providers' Association last month.
"As set out in the Strategic Defence and Security Review we will legislate as soon as parliamentary time allows to ensure that the use of communications data is compatible with the government's approach to civil liberties," the Home Office spokesman said.
Any proposed legislation changes are likely to face stiff opposition in both houses of the British Parliament.
A similar proposal was considered by the then-ruling Labour party in 2006 but was abandoned in the face of fierce opposition by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, who are junior partners in the ruling coalition.
The proposed legislation could reflect the U.S. Patriot Act, controversially introduced six weeks after September 11 in 2001, to expand the government's authority to monitor the communications activity of its citizens.
(Reporting by Stephen Mangan; Editing by Michael Roddy)
SOURCE http://www.reuters.com
The Large Families that rule the world
Some people have started realizing that there are large financial groups that dominate the world. Forget the political intrigues, conflicts, revolutions and wars. It is not pure chance. Everything has been planned for a long time.
Some call it “conspiracy theories” or New World Order. Anyway, the key to understanding the current political and economic events is a restricted core of families who have accumulated more wealth and power.
We are speaking of 6, 8 or maybe 12 families who truly dominate the world. Know that it is a mystery difficult to unravel.
We will not be far from the truth by citing Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Loebs Kuh and Lehmans in New York, the Rothschilds of Paris and London, the Warburgs of Hamburg, Paris and Lazards Israel Moses Seifs Rome.
Many people have heard of the Bilderberg Group, Illuminati or the Trilateral Commission. But what are the names of the families who run the world and have control of states and international organizations like the UN, NATO or the IMF?
To try to answer this question, we can start with the easiest: inventory, the world’s largest banks, and see who the shareholders are and who make the decisions.
The world’s largest companies are now: Bank of America, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.Let us now review who their shareholders are.
A vote in the Parliament's committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs on 27 March suggested that of the five major political groups, only the Liberals and the Greens are firm in their opposition to the deal. The centre-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group, the second-largest in Parliament, is divided, while the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), the Parliament's largest, and the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) are in favour. The committee voted 31 to 23 in favour of the passenger name record (PNR) agreement, with one abstention.
Serious crimes
The PNR agreement gives the US authorities access to names, addresses, credit card numbers and similar information from European airline passengers. Under the new agreement, which is to replace a deal from 2007 that is currently in provisional application, this information can be used only in investigations of terrorist or other serious crimes. The agreement provides a range of safeguards, for example the requirement to render the data anonymous after six months.The Obama administration has made it clear that it is not prepared to re-negotiate the agreement. A ‘No' vote by MEPs would therefore mean a return to legal uncertainty, since the US would still demand PNR from airlines, and airlines would feel compelled to oblige.
Many MEPs appeared convinced by the argument put forward by Cecilia Malmström, the European commissioner for home affairs, that the new agreement is the best available option.
By Toby Vogel
SOURCE http://www.europeanvoice.com
Britain set for sweeping Internet, phone monitoring
Britain is to allow one of its intelligence agencies to monitor all phone calls, texts, emails and online activities in the country to help tackle crime and militant attacks, the Interior Ministry said on Sunday.
"It is vital that police and security services are able to obtain communications data in certain circumstances to investigate serious crime and terrorism and to protect the public," a Home Office spokesman said.
The proposed law already has drawn strong criticism, from within the ruling Conservative Party's own ranks, as an invasion of privacy and personal rights.
"What the government hasn't explained is precisely why they intend to eavesdrop on all of us without even going to a judge for a warrant, which is what always used to happen," Member of Parliament David Davis told BBC News.
"It is an unnecessary extension of the ability of the state to snoop on ordinary people," he said.
New legislation is expected to be announced in the legislative agenda-setting speech given by the queen in May.
Currently, British agencies can monitor calls and e-mails of specific individuals who may be under investigation after obtaining ministerial approval, but expanding that to all citizens is certain to enrage civil liberties campaigners.
Internet companies would be required to install hardware which would allow the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), referred to as Britain's electronic 'listening' agency, to gain real-time access to communications data.
The new law would not allow GCHQ to access the content of emails, calls or messages without a warrant, but it would allow it to trace who an individual or group was in contact with, how frequently they communicated and for how long.
The Sunday Times newspaper, which first reported the story, said some details of the proposals were given to members of the Britain's Internet Service Providers' Association last month.
"As set out in the Strategic Defence and Security Review we will legislate as soon as parliamentary time allows to ensure that the use of communications data is compatible with the government's approach to civil liberties," the Home Office spokesman said.
Any proposed legislation changes are likely to face stiff opposition in both houses of the British Parliament.
A similar proposal was considered by the then-ruling Labour party in 2006 but was abandoned in the face of fierce opposition by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, who are junior partners in the ruling coalition.
The proposed legislation could reflect the U.S. Patriot Act, controversially introduced six weeks after September 11 in 2001, to expand the government's authority to monitor the communications activity of its citizens.
(Reporting by Stephen Mangan; Editing by Michael Roddy)
SOURCE http://www.reuters.com
The Large Families that rule the world
Some people have started realizing that there are large financial groups that dominate the world. Forget the political intrigues, conflicts, revolutions and wars. It is not pure chance. Everything has been planned for a long time.
Some call it “conspiracy theories” or New World Order. Anyway, the key to understanding the current political and economic events is a restricted core of families who have accumulated more wealth and power.
We are speaking of 6, 8 or maybe 12 families who truly dominate the world. Know that it is a mystery difficult to unravel.
We will not be far from the truth by citing Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Loebs Kuh and Lehmans in New York, the Rothschilds of Paris and London, the Warburgs of Hamburg, Paris and Lazards Israel Moses Seifs Rome.
Many people have heard of the Bilderberg Group, Illuminati or the Trilateral Commission. But what are the names of the families who run the world and have control of states and international organizations like the UN, NATO or the IMF?
To try to answer this question, we can start with the easiest: inventory, the world’s largest banks, and see who the shareholders are and who make the decisions.
The world’s largest companies are now: Bank of America, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.Let us now review who their shareholders are.
Bank of America:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, FMR (Fidelity), Paulson, JP Morgan, T. Rowe, Capital World Investors, AXA, Bank of NY, Mellon.
JP Morgan:
State Street Corp., Vanguard Group, FMR, BlackRock, T. Rowe, AXA, Capital World Investor, Capital Research Global
Investor, Northern Trust Corp. and Bank of Mellon.
Citigroup:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Paulson, FMR, Capital World Investor, JP Morgan, Northern Trust Corporation, Fairhome Capital Mgmt and Bank of NY Mellon.
Wells Fargo:
Berkshire Hathaway, FMR, State Street, Vanguard Group, Capital World Investors, BlackRock, Wellington Mgmt, AXA, T. Rowe and Davis Selected Advisers.
We can see that now there appears to be a nucleus present in all banks: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock and FMR (Fidelity). To avoid repeating them, we will now call them the “big four”
Goldman Sachs:
“The big four,” Wellington, Capital World Investors, AXA, Massachusetts Financial Service and T. Rowe.
Morgan Stanley:
“The big four,” Mitsubishi UFJ, Franklin Resources, AXA, T. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon e Jennison Associates. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon and Jennison Associates.
We can just about always verify the names of major shareholders. To go further, we can now try to find out the shareholders of these companies and shareholders of major banks worldwide.
Bank of NY Mellon:
Davis Selected, Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Dodge, Cox, Southeatern Asset Mgmt. and … “The big four.”
State Street Corporation (one of the “big four”):
Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Barrow Hanley, GE, Putnam Investment and … The “big four” (shareholders themselves!).
BlackRock (another of the “big four”):
PNC, Barclays e CIC.
Who is behind the PNC? FMR (Fidelity), BlackRock, State Street, etc.
And behind Barclays? BlackRock
And we could go on for hours, passing by tax havens in the Cayman Islands, Monaco or the legal domicile of Shell companies in Liechtenstein. A network where companies are always the same, but never a name of a family.
In short: the eight largest U.S. financial companies (JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan Stanley) are 100% controlled by ten shareholders and we have four companies always present in all decisions: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity.
In addition, the Federal Reserve is comprised of 12 banks, represented by a board of seven people, which comprises
representatives of the “big four,” which in turn are present in all other entities.
In short, the Federal Reserve is controlled by four large private companies: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity. These companies control U.S. monetary policy (and world) without any control or “democratic” choice. These companies launched and participated in the current worldwide economic crisis and managed to become even more enriched.
To finish, a look at some of the companies controlled by this “big four” group
In addition, all these people run the large financial institutions, such as the IMF, the European Central Bank or the World Bank, and were “trained” and remain “employees” of the “big four” that formed them.
The names of the families that control the “big four”, never appear.
Translated from the Portuguese version by:
Lisa Karpova
Pravda.Ru
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, FMR (Fidelity), Paulson, JP Morgan, T. Rowe, Capital World Investors, AXA, Bank of NY, Mellon.
JP Morgan:
State Street Corp., Vanguard Group, FMR, BlackRock, T. Rowe, AXA, Capital World Investor, Capital Research Global
Investor, Northern Trust Corp. and Bank of Mellon.
Citigroup:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Paulson, FMR, Capital World Investor, JP Morgan, Northern Trust Corporation, Fairhome Capital Mgmt and Bank of NY Mellon.
Wells Fargo:
Berkshire Hathaway, FMR, State Street, Vanguard Group, Capital World Investors, BlackRock, Wellington Mgmt, AXA, T. Rowe and Davis Selected Advisers.
We can see that now there appears to be a nucleus present in all banks: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock and FMR (Fidelity). To avoid repeating them, we will now call them the “big four”
Goldman Sachs:
“The big four,” Wellington, Capital World Investors, AXA, Massachusetts Financial Service and T. Rowe.
Morgan Stanley:
“The big four,” Mitsubishi UFJ, Franklin Resources, AXA, T. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon e Jennison Associates. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon and Jennison Associates.
We can just about always verify the names of major shareholders. To go further, we can now try to find out the shareholders of these companies and shareholders of major banks worldwide.
Bank of NY Mellon:
Davis Selected, Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Dodge, Cox, Southeatern Asset Mgmt. and … “The big four.”
State Street Corporation (one of the “big four”):
Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Barrow Hanley, GE, Putnam Investment and … The “big four” (shareholders themselves!).
BlackRock (another of the “big four”):
PNC, Barclays e CIC.
Who is behind the PNC? FMR (Fidelity), BlackRock, State Street, etc.
And behind Barclays? BlackRock
And we could go on for hours, passing by tax havens in the Cayman Islands, Monaco or the legal domicile of Shell companies in Liechtenstein. A network where companies are always the same, but never a name of a family.
In short: the eight largest U.S. financial companies (JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan Stanley) are 100% controlled by ten shareholders and we have four companies always present in all decisions: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity.
In addition, the Federal Reserve is comprised of 12 banks, represented by a board of seven people, which comprises
representatives of the “big four,” which in turn are present in all other entities.
In short, the Federal Reserve is controlled by four large private companies: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity. These companies control U.S. monetary policy (and world) without any control or “democratic” choice. These companies launched and participated in the current worldwide economic crisis and managed to become even more enriched.
To finish, a look at some of the companies controlled by this “big four” group
- Alcoa Inc.
- Altria Group Inc.
- American International Group Inc.
- AT&T Inc.
- Boeing Co.
- Caterpillar Inc.
- Coca-Cola Co.
- DuPont & Co.
- Exxon Mobil Corp.
- General Electric Co.
- General Motors Corporation
- Hewlett-Packard Co.
- Home Depot Inc.
- Honeywell International Inc.
- Intel Corp.
- International Business Machines Corp
- Johnson & Johnson
- JP Morgan Chase & Co.
- McDonald’s Corp.
- Merck & Co. Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- 3M Co.
- Pfizer Inc.
- Procter & Gamble Co.
- United Technologies Corp.
- Verizon Communications Inc.
- Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
- Time Warner
- Walt Disney
- Viacom
- Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation.,
- CBS Corporation
- NBC Universal
In addition, all these people run the large financial institutions, such as the IMF, the European Central Bank or the World Bank, and were “trained” and remain “employees” of the “big four” that formed them.
The names of the families that control the “big four”, never appear.
Translated from the Portuguese version by:
Lisa Karpova
Pravda.Ru
Labels: CYBERNETICS
Link
posted by The visioner @ 9:05 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home