UTF-8 http://feraios.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
Google

Saturday, December 25, 2010

GREECE SHOULD minimize ITS RELATIONS WITH ISRAEL ,WHICH LATELY BY FALSE POLICIES ,WERE DEVELOPED

AND COOPERATE WITH  EUROPEAN  UNION'S  SPECIALIZED COUNTRIES  ,FOR THE SPECIFIC TERRITORIAL FOSSILE  ENERGY ISSUE (as it seems again that N.York is taking care )

(clicking on the link we are being redirected to an un-truth article)

Agreement for the Delimitation of the Exclusive Economic Zone between Israel and Cyprus


An agreement between the State of Israel and the Republic of Cyprus for the delimitation of the exclusive economic zone between the two states was signedon 17th of December 2010.

more at http://nicosia.mfa.gov.il/mfm/web/main/missionhome.asp?LanguageID=&Question2=&MissionID=21&MissionID=
 
 
 
Hydrocarbon politics in the Eastern Mediterranean


Analysts estimate reserves at Tamar of around 142 billion cubic meters (BCM), valued at around $3.6 billion, with a $1.5 billion extraction cost. The discovery has been heralded by Noble’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Charles Davidson as possibly “the largest discovery in the company’s history.” For a company like Noble that boasts assets of more than $12 billion, that’s no passing phrase.


A few months after the initial discovery, Noble found another deposit of gas at Dalit, 13 kilometers east of Tamar. That discovery is expected to yield reserves of around 14 BCM, or around 10 percent of the Tamar find. Noble declined to comment on the finds and Executive is legally forbidden to correspond with Noble’s Israeli partners.

The amount of gas present in the two fields could potentially serve Israel’s gas demand for a decade, or even longer.

“We are witnessing an historic moment in Israel’s energy market,” Israeli Infrastructure Minister Binyamin Ben Eliezer said at the time of the Tamar find.



Noble Energy’s operations in Israel and Cyprus





Source: Noble Energy.

A thorny relationship

At present Israel depends on Egyptian gas exports to run its power plants. The agreement for Egypt to supply Israel with a constant stream of gas comes under a clause of the Camp David accords, signed in 1979, and stipulates that the two parties will set a fixed price for each million thermal units (MMBTU), the standard unit of measurement for commercial gas exports, which corresponds to around 28 cubic meters of gas. The export of Egyptian gas to Israel has been the cause of much controversy in Egypt where anti-Israeli public sentiment is pervasive 30 years after the two countries’ leaders signed a peace treaty.

The issue of Egyptian gas exports to Israel remains a thorn in the side of both governments; politically for the Egyptians and in terms of energy planning for the Israelis. Hence, while energy independence for Israel would constitute a negative for Egypt’s current account, it could also translate into some much needed wiggle room for Egypt’s autocractic government.

“The opposition parties are always questioning the wisdom of supplying Israel with gas,” says Ibrahim Saif, resident scholar specializing in the political economy of the Middle East at the Carnegie Middle East Center. “Egypt is [always] trying to downplay that subject because there is a sentiment in Egypt that is against supplying Israel with gas.”


How much do they really have?

While Israel’s estimated gas reserves seem promising, they are still just that, estimates. The numbers currently available only indicate a ‘geological reserve’ based on seismic surveys conducted from above the seabed. The fields still have to undergo an appraisal phase to ascertain how large the ‘proven reserve’ is and exactly how much of the gas can actually be extracted.

“The initial discovery does not provide a clear picture as to the structure of the field. You need a year until it becomes a proven reserve and only part of it can be extracted,” said Ziad Arbahe, a Syrian energy consultant.

Arbahe explained that commonly only 30 to 40 percent of a geological reserve can be extracted. There have been rare cases where up to 50 percent has been extracted, but this usually requires that a company inject water into a field, increasing operational costs and often damaging the field itself.

“In general, when there is a find, countries and companies are optimistic about the amount. But when you start to produce… the initial estimation is usually much higher than the actual amount,” Arbahe adds.


On the Lebanese side…

The recent discoveries have “caused a flurry of interest in the Lebanese offshore area,” says Charles Harmer, executive vice president of multi-client services at Spectrum Geo, the company that previously performed preliminary seismic surveys for the Lebanese government between 2000 and 2007.

Fawaz Mourad, the regional representative of Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS), agrees. His company and Spectrum Geo have both conducted seismic surveys in Lebanon’s offshore area, which is part of the “Levantine basin.”

The Levantine basin is the underwater geological structure that is located beneath the territorial waters of Lebanon, Israel, Cyprus and Syria. The basin itself has “similar structures and formations” in both Israeli and Lebanese waters which makes “offshore Lebanon even more interesting and more prospective,” says Mourad.

Lebanese oil and gas exploration began in the late 1960’s and early to mid-1970’s with the drilling of several wells across the country. Then, like many things in Lebanon at the time, exploration came to a grinding halt when Lebanon’s civil war began in 1975. After the war, Syria and Lebanon formed the “Committee of Cooperation between Lebanon and Syria for Oil Exploration in Lebanon,” which lasted until Syrian troops pulled out of Lebanon in 2005 after the assassination of the former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri.

“The order from [current Syrian] president Assad’s father was to help Lebanon by all means possible, even for free, to get oil out of Lebanese ground,” says Ali Haidar, a former member of the committee and current petroleum studies professor in Beirut. “There were some favorable interpretations of this behavior on some Lebanese sides and on others there were unfavorable [interpretations].”

During the run-up to Lebanon’s parliamentary elections, Nabih Berri, the country’s speaker of parliament and member of the current opposition, stressed the importance of “encouraging the exploration of [oil and gas] prospects in all the Lebanese territories,” ostensibly referring to the continuation of onshore exploration.

However, little headway has been made in Lebanon since pre-war drilling, despite the fact that Lebanon is part of the same geological structure where proven gas deposits have been found in Syria “only 40 kilometers from the Lebanese border,” says Haidar. Today, Lebanon’s old wells still sit idle and efforts to resume exploration have been “postponed” according to a senior executive at Lebanon’s Ministry of Energy and Water.

Ghazi Youssef, a member of Lebanon’s new ruling parliamentary coalition who used to manage the oil and gas file as an advisor to former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri in the earlier part of this decade, is nonetheless pessimistic about the prospects of oil and gas aground in Lebanon. He says that the issue of exploring these wells should be put on a “back burner” because “all the reports I have seen in the past do not really show the possibility of a major find [onshore]. It’s mostly tar and other residue but not hydrocarbons. Things point more to the offshore fields than they do onshore.”

Move to water


Indeed, since 2000 the focus of the Lebanese government and international oil and survey companies has been on offshore exploration. In 2002, the Lebanese government entered into an agreement with Spectrum Geo to perform a two-dimensional seismic survey off the coast of Lebanon to supplement a survey completed in 2000, which did not require government permission “because of the location and the fact that there was no previous work in the area,” says Harmer. Two-dimensional seismic surveys are used to identify breaks and possible traps in geological formations where there is a high possibility that oil or gas may be present.

The agreement gave Spectrum Geo the right to gather data off the Lebanese coast at its own cost and to later sell the data to prospective oil companies on a licensing basis. The Lebanese government would then receive a percentage of the license agreement and get a copy of the final data.

“We had to try to sell it as many times as we could to cover our costs and then make a profit on it,”says Harmer.

The agreement itself, however, ended in 2007, and the government says Spectrum Geo has requested another five year agreement with the Lebanese state.

In both 2006 and 2007, the government commissioned another Norwegian survey company, Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS), to perform three-dimensional seismic surveys off the coast of Lebanon. Three-dimensional studies subject geological formations to sets of waves which then ‘bounce back’ off these structures to provide a clearer view below a surface.

But several experts have questioned the manner in which the three-dimensional studies were conducted. “Normally when you have such a huge possibility… you do a lot more than this,” says Haidar. Harmer of Spectrum agrees. “It is very unusual to shoot a [three-dimensional seismic survey] like that. I still don’t understand why they have shot those.”

Mourad of PGS, however, insists that the data acquired was “comprehensive” and that “there is enough data to allow the companies to drill. They don’t need to do more 3-D surveys. So if a bid-round takes place over the areas which are covered by the 3-D survey, then the oil companies are able to drill immediately, thus saving a lot of time,” he says.

According to Sarkis Hlaiss, general manager and head of Lebanon’s gas and oil installations committee at the Ministry of Energy and Water, the main reason that a more extensive survey was not done is that the Lebanese government and PGS are currently performing another two-dimensional survey on Lebanon’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), which was only delimited — the process by which a country defines its borders — in May by a committee at the energy and water ministry. A source at the United Nations, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the issue of border demarcation between Lebanon and Israel has yet to be officially resolved by the UN and stressed that maritime borders would only be addressed once the border delimitation on the ground has been completed. PGS insists that the issue is inconsequential.

“Even if they haven’t officially delimited it, it doesn’t mean that it is disputed. There is no dispute,” said Mourad.

In any case, most experts agree that it is premature to consider the possibility of common resources before all the results of Lebanon’s seismic surveys are completed to ascertain if there are fields shared with Israel. The results of the survey are expected to become available within four to five months.

“By the end of September we will have the complete data in two-dimensions and three-dimensions from PGS,” says Hlaiss.

The new survey will employ seismic technology developed by PGS that enables seismic waves to overcome the distortions caused by layers of salt present across the Levantine Basin. The results of the survey will provide data that is much clearer and more useful to prospective oil companies and the Lebanese government, who can negotiate better if a bidding round ever materializes.


Dollars for data

According to Mourad, PGS has invested “tens of millions of dollars” to acquire data off the Lebanese coast. The company “hopes to recover its investment by selling the data” to oil companies looking to enter any Lebanese oil and gas market, once the government starts a bidding round and offers licenses to companies to start drilling offshore.

“PGS has not sold any data for the simple reason that companies, when they own data, need to know that they can do something with it, like participate in a bid round,” said Mourad.


But in order to open up a bidding round, Lebanon would need to have a law that dictates the terms and obligations of both the Lebanese government and prospective oil companies — something the Lebanese government has been dragging its feet on for decades.

“Until now we don’t have a law, it’s a disaster,” says Hlaiss. All the countries of the Eastern Mediterranean who have access to the Levantine Basin have legislation that apportions their maritime territory into blocs, ready for sale to prospective oil companies looking to explore their offshore prospects. Cyprus opened its first bidding session in 2007, as did Syria.

Fortunately for Lebanon, they have some friends in high places within the oil and gas industry. Since 2007 the Norwegian Agency for Development Co-operation (NORAD), as part of its ‘Oil for Development’ program, has been assisting the Lebanese energy ministry to draft a new law to the tune of “several million dollars to start putting legislation in place [and] actually start a bid round,” says one oil and gas industry executive who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Martin Yettervik, counselor at the Norwegian Embassy in Lebanon, says that the program is about institution building as opposed to drilling and is aimed at helping the Lebanese avoid the pitfalls of an energy dependent economy.

“For any country that is new to petroleum, it is important to take into account the economic effect of the petroleum economy, because it is different from other kinds of economic factors,” says Yettervik. “There are examples around the world where, when the petroleum economy dominates, it is to the detriment of the other fields in the country.”

Countries such as Nigeria and Iran have felt the pain of an economy overly dependent on petroleum resources. However the risk to Lebanon is not just economic. The potential for oil and gas revenues to play into Lebanon’s polarized and volatile sectarian political mixture is very real. One look at the electricity or telecommunications situation in the country and an ineffective or politically tainted oil and gas industry could be “another killer,” according to professor Haidar.

Nonetheless, Yettervik insists that the program has not become “a tool for one or another power factor in a country” and that “since the beginning we have seen a trans-political cooperation, even when the country was in the deepest of crisis,” referring to the 18-month political standoff that led to the May 2008 conflict in Lebanon.



Norway’s helping hand

The Oil for Development program is set to carry on until 2011, at the behest of the Lebanese government. In order to expedite the process of drafting the still non-existent law, the Norwegian government has contracted an international law firm to assist the energy ministry with setting up a bidding round and has trained several officials at the ministries of energy and water, and finance and environment. Both Spectrum Geo and PGS’s head offices are located in Norway, but Hlaiss insists that the Norwegian government “didn’t ask for anything in return.”

Yettervik admits that the program “gives the Lebanese authorities familiarity with the Norwegian system,” but insists that any collusion between the Norwegian government and its companies “would be contrary to the spirit of the program.”

The government has confirmed that the new law will allow Lebanon to alter the output of any firm that extract’s oil or gas, which, if done hastily, could damage any potential field and substantially reduce its long term productivity. Moreover, the law will oblige future oil companies to adhere to the Lebanese labor law, which compels them to hire a majority of Lebanese citizens if qualified persons are present in the country.

According to the energy ministry and the Norwegian embassy, the draft exploration law is all but completed. The text, which is still in English, is complete and is in the translation process. Once in the Lebanese Parliament, it will be subject to the scrutiny of the country’s conflicting political interests.

“We are trying to push [the law] through this government,” says one government official who spoke off the record. “If we don’t, and the minister [of energy and water] changes, it will take us another three months to explain to the new minister what we are doing and then who knows [how long it will take].”

MP Youssef expressed his coalition’s desire to depose the current minister, whose party is part of the opposition, but insists that it will not derail the process.

“We believe that when someone comes to power you don’t just take everything and throw it down the drain; there’s continuity. We have to deal with [the law] and try to finish it as soon as possible.”


Sharing with the enemy

Perhaps the most important point to consider in Lebanon’s energy saga may be that if Tamar, Dalit or another field is a common field between Lebanon and Israel then the latter is currently usurping Lebanon’s natural gas.

“Whoever starts before gets the resources because of drainage,” says Haidar, adding that the clock is now ticking down on the Lebanese government’s opportunity to tap this resource before the Israelis do.

Contested borders have always posed a problem in the Middle East, especially when it comes to hydrocarbon resources. The “neutral zone” between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait that was demarcated by the Anglo-Turkish convention in 1913 still exists today. It has been a source of ongoing disputes over maritime borders between Kuwait and Iran for some time, although Kuwait and Saudi Arabia have come to an agreement over how to share the resources present in the area. Lebanon and Israel however remain in a state of war, and Israel still occupies some of Lebanon’s territory. Hence the issue of sharing resources, if indeed they do exist, seems far-fetched at best; more likely, perhaps, is the prospect of further conflict between the countries over energy.

“This is not going to be an easy issue,” says Saif. “If Israel starts to pump and utilize [any common resource], it would be a source of contention and Lebanon will find itself forced to move and to block any Israeli unilateral move.”

Most experts agree that it is highly improbable that the recent finds at Tamar and Dalit constitute a common field because of the distance between the finds and the border area, but that does not preclude the possibility of it being one or that one could exist, given the commonalties between the Lebanese and Israeli areas of the Levantine Basin. Just to make sure Israel is aware of Lebanon’s territorial concerns, the prime minister’s office has sent a letter to Noble demanding that the company does not encroach upon Lebanese maritime territory, according to a government source who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Even if Lebanon does manage to pass a law, starts the bidding process and brings in the oil companies in to begin drilling, the economic benefits will not be felt until much further down the line. The Tamar field is not expected to produce commercial quantities of gas until at least 2013. One energy consultant offered to bet this journalist $1,000 that commercial quantities would not be extracted before 2015. Moreover, any potential Lebanese field may take even longer enter production.

“In eight years, if we find something, we can actually open the lid and start making some money. Whoever wakes up first gets the money and the resources,” says Haidar.

If the Lebanese don’t wake up soon, they may well find themselves snoozing through yet another regional boom and lose the chance to revive their debt-ridden economy.



By Sami Halabi


SOURCE  http://www.executive-magazine.com/

 
 
 
 
 
 
Hydrocarbon Exploration Blocks in part of the Exclusive Economic Zone of Cyprus


Distribution of Oil & Gas Fields and Discoveries in Eastern Mediterrane


Physiography of the Eastern Mediterranean (from MediMap Group 2005)

Labels:

Link

Friday, December 17, 2010

EHEALTH - AN EXCHANGE OF DATA ,A MONODROME PATH

WE WISH TO ALL OUR FELLOWS ,
HAPPY FESTIVITIES AND A  HEALTHY 2011
peace-agapee-oecoumenism

Commission signs eHealth agreement with US Department of Health


(Clicking at the title you are redirected to an important article  named " Data control, terrorism and the problem with US regulation " )


Vice-President of the European Commission Neelie Kroes and United States Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius have today signed a Memorandum of Understanding in Washington to promote a common approach on the interoperability of electronic health records and on education programmes for information technology and health professionals. Common standards and interoperability stand to create huge growth opportunities for the eHealth industry as well as having a positive impact on the safety and quality of care. A skilled health IT workforce is necessary to make the benefits of eHealth services available to patients. This agreement aims to boost the potential of the eHealth market for EU companies wishing to do business in the US and vice versa. Promoting the use of eHealth technologies, with a view to improving the quality of health care, reducing medical costs and fostering independent living, including in remote places, is key objective of the Digital Agenda for Europe (see IP/10/581, MEMO/10/199 and MEMO/10/200).

Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the European Commission for the Digital Agenda, said: "Nothing makes more of a difference to people's lives than good health. I warmly welcome today's agreement. It is an excellent basis for the Commission and the US authorities to expand our cooperation on promoting the overall benefits of eHealth for patients, health systems and companies."

During her visit to the Transatlantic Economic Council in Washington today (see IP/10/1712), Neelie Kroes and US Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sibelius signed the eHealth Memorandum of Understanding to promote cooperation on eHealth between the European Commission and the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The aim of the Memorandum of Understanding is to create new markets and growth opportunities for industry in the eHealth sector in both the EU and the US. The ICT sector drives 50% of productivity growth in the EU and eHealth has a great potential for market growth. It can stimulate innovation in healthcare systems and traditionally strong healthcare industries such as pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

The take up in the US of electronic health records outside hospitals is four times lower than in Europe. In the coming years, the US will invest around $20 billion in deploying interoperable health records to physicians. This could have a positive impact on procurement for European companies in the US as well as boosting the Single Market for eHealth in the EU. This will give patients better health and quality of life and improve the existing infrastructure of health care systems.


The Memorandum stresses the need for a joint vision on internationally recognised and utilised interoperability standards for electronic health record systems and increased competences and mobility of IT professionals. Such common standards are important to achieve widespread interoperable eHealth services so that eHealth can reach its full global market potential.

Potential activities foreseen within the framework of the Memorandum include the following:

*exchanges of information on ongoing activities that are carried out directly by the Commission and HHS, and that are relevant to the promotion of eHealth

*exchanges of delegations and specialists, selected with the endorsement of the Commission and HHS, for example in the framework of the Commission’s eHealth Governance Initiative

*establishment of joint working groups to identify specific strategies for achieving shared goals, and

*collaboratively organised meetings, scientific conferences, workshops and/or symposia.


The partnership between the EU and the US, the two world leaders in eHealth, sends a strong signal to all stakeholders that common standards and interoperability bring opportunities for a global approach for the benefit of patients, health systems and the market.

The Transatlantic Economic Council is a political body that oversees and accelerates government-to-government cooperation to advance economic integration between the EU and the US. Main issues at this year's conference include the signing of the Memorandum on eHealth, discussing possibilities to stimulate more cooperation on research and identifying how synergies could be created between the Digital Agenda for Europe and US policies in this field.
 
SOURCE   http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/
 
 





OPEN GOVERNMENT 2010




THE LAST TWO DAYS ON 15-16/12/10 WE ATTENDED THE OPEN E-GOVERNMENT SUMMIT,BEING ORGANIZED ,VERY WELL ,BY THE BELGIAN PRESIDENCY.

DURING THE FIRST DAY THE USA ICT RESPONSIBLE PERSON,SPOKE TO US,THROUGH AN HOLOGRAM,PROMOTING THE CLOUD TECHNOLOGY,APART FROM GOOGLE,MICROSOFT,APPLE,FACEBOOK ETC.

A LOT OF IMPORTANT PUBLIC STAKEHOLDERS ,FROM ALL AROUND EUROPE,PARTICIPATED TO THE EVENT ...

HERE IS AN ARTICLE ABOUT CLOUD TECHNOLOGY

Government warnings could kill the cloud

THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Labels:

Link

Monday, December 06, 2010

SPACE IS OUR HOPE FOR THE NEW ERA,WHICH IS ARISING

ON 30/11-1/12  OUR epaphos  TEAMWORK   ATTENDED THE SATCOM GENERAL ASSEMBLY (190 MEMBERS),WHICH TOOK PLACE AT DG INFSO AT BRUSSELS,BELGIUM.

The Integral Satcom Initiative (ISI) is the European Technology Platform on Satellite Communications, whose membership embraces major part of relevant private and public stakeholders from Satellite Communications (SatCom) and Space sector in Europe.



WE WERE INTRODUCED TO  A  LIVELY AND FRIENDLY ,SATELLITE COMMUNITY ,WHICH DECLARED ITS POSITION  FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTIONS ,ON THE FIELDS OF  AVANT GUARDE SCIENCE AND SPECTRUM  THEMES.
WE BY OUR PART , HOPING  THAT WE CONTRIBUTED  TO THE  GOOD SPIRIT  OF  THE COMMUNITY ,WE HAVE   COMMENTED  FOR  THE NEED OF   ESTABLISHING A DEPARTMENT FOR INTELECTUAL PROPERTY (PATERNS) ,COMBINED WITH THE EXISTING STANDARDIZATION ONE .
ALSO WE RAISED THE QUESTION  TOWARDS  AN OPENING  TO THE CITIZEN'S  FOR SPACE  ISSUES ,THROUGH THE SOCIAL PLATFORMS ,BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE ,FOR SURE WILL PROMOTE   TRADE ,PRODUCTION AND SCIENCE ACTIVITIES.
DURING THE EVENT VERY IMPORTANT SCIENTISTS ,STAKEHOLDERS AND MEP ( HON. E.BROK-HON.  EDIT  HERCZOG) PRESENTED US ,THEIR  STANCE  ON SEVERAL ISSUES,WHICH CAN BE READ AT

http://www.isi-initiative.org/

APART FROM THIS  IMPORTANT ASSEMBLY ,FOR EUROPEAN  UNION'S SPACE POLICIES,
ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ATLANTIC ,NASA MADE AN ASTRO-BIOLOGICAL DISCOVERY

One of the basic assumptions about life on Earth may be due for a revision thanks to research supported by NASA’s Astrobiology Program. Geomicrobiologist Felisa Wolfe-Simon has discovered a bacterium in California’s Mono Lake that uses arsenic instead of phosphorus in its DNA. Up until now, it was believed that all life required phosphorus as a fundamental piece of the ‘backbone’ that holds DNA together. The discovery of an organism that thrives on otherwise poisonous arsenic broadens our thinking about the possibility of life on other planets, and begs a rewrite of biology textbooks by changing our understanding of how life is formed from its most basic elemental building blocks.

SOURCE   http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/

AS WE SAW THE STREAMING PRESENTATION THROUGH THE WEB ,A LOT OF SKEPTICISM WAS BORN.
THE SCIENTIFIC PANEL WAS CONSISTED FROM  A DELIRIOUS
HOLLYWOOD TEAM,WHICH DECLARED  WITH TRIOUMPH  THE NEW  DISCOVERY.
THIS   PROVED THAT APART FROM THE MAIN  SIX  ELEMENTS (C,H,O,N,P,S)
ON WHICH OUR LIFE FORMS ARE BASED ,IT CAN EXIST ALSO OTHER,LIKE THIS OF As (ARSENICUM,33) WHICH IS NEXT TO PHOSPHORUS (15) ,ACCORDING TO MEDELEYEV'S PERIODIC TABLE.
BY THIS WE UNDERSTAND THAT  OUR NATURE ,ISN'T WELL INVESTIGATED  YET AND WE SHOULD PROCEED TO FURTHER ANALYSES ,TO OTHER LAKE  SYSTEMS  WHICH HAVE ABOUT THE SAME  ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.
THE PECULIAR ISSUE IS THAT THE BACTERIUM NOT ONLY HAS IN ITS DNA  As BUT IT IS FED WITH IT TOO.
SCIENTISTS MUST FOLLOW THE OLD TRADITIONAL RESEARCH WAYS ,OF DISCUSSIONS ,PAPER PUBLISHMENTS ON TIME,COOPERATION WITH INTERESTED CITIZENS  SPECIAL GROUPS.
WE WRITE THIS BECAUSE WE SAW A RAPIDNESS IN ANNOUNCING  THE  THEME   BY THIS NOT BEING INVESTIGATED PROPERLY,TOGETHER WITH THE INTERNATIONAL ASTROBIOLOGY COMMUNITY.

http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/3698/thriving-on-arsenic

THE   IMPORTANT THING WAS,ACCORDING TO MRS  Wolfe-Simon ,THAT THE WHOLE STUFF WAS  MADE  BY AN  AMERICAN (USA) TEAM AND MONEY.
THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONS WHICH CAN BE RAISED ABOUT SUCH A DISCOVERY,AS IT SEEMS THAT SOME SCIENTISTS (AND MAYBE OTHERS) THEY WANT TO REPLACE PHOSPHORUS TO OUR NATURE'S CHAIN THROUGH  DIFFERENT   METHODS AND ELEMENTS (for phosphorus click at our title in order to be informed about how ecosystems are affected).

THIS FROM THE  SCIENTIFIC  RESEARCH ,POINT OF VIEW IS  POSITIVE ,IF WE CONDUCT OUR EXPERIMENTS AWAY FROM  GAIA'S    EN-VIRON-MENT .
(WE PROPOSED DURING LAST YEAR'S NANOTECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE THE SPACE STATION,AS  SUCH A PLACE ).
IN THIS WAY WE SHALL EXPERIMENT ,WITHOUT PUTING IN DANGER THE EARTHEAN   LIFE BALLANCE,BY CREATING AND  MULTIPLYING OTHER MORPHES OF  EX-I-STENCE  ,WHICH MAY  AFFECT   ON  OUR  CLOSED (IN A  MAJOR WAY ) PLANETIC SYSTEM.
SOLUTIONS ABOUT PHOSPHOROUS (SINCE WE ARE FACING AN EL-LEIPSIS or LAPSE OF IT)  AND ITS SUBSTITUTES ARE ALREADY OFFERED  EITHER BY WELL ORGANIZED RECYCLING  METHODS  OR BY NATURAL  ELEMENTS,BUT GLOBALISTS  ARE FACING  A COST  PROBLEM....



THANK YOU ALL
A.CH.

Labels:

Link