(BEING CONTINUED FROM BREXIT II )
POLITAES,CITIZENS,METAPOLITANS,
READERS AND FOLLOWERS,CHAIRESTHAI,
THINGS ARE PROCEEDING WELL THANKS TO YOUR KINDNESS AND THE eCOWAVERS SUPPORT IF IT IS TAKEN OUT OF CONSIDERATION A VIOLENT ACT AGAINST THE WRITER OF THE TEXT BY SOMEBODY PAID FROM THOSE WHO DONT LIKE OUR IDEAS.
ENDING OUR INTERFERENCE WITH BREXIT IT SHOULD BE MENTIONED THAT THE PROPOSAL DONE FROM OUR PART WAS HEARD BY THE BRITISH DEEPER SOCIETY WHICH INVITED ME TWICE HERE IN BRUSSELS IN ORDER TO ANALYSE IT.
a)Exploring arrangements to avoid a hard Irish border after Brexit 11/07/19
AT A BROADER AUDIENCE WERE BRIEFLY MENTIONED OUR IDEAS:
A)5 YEARS DELAY AND AFTER NEW REFERENDUM B)NEW EUROPEAN CURRENCY ON PARALLEL WITH EURO C)UK TO ORGANISE WITH CONSILIUM THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE COMMUNITY
b) AT AAC MEETING EXPRESSING OUR SUGGESTED POLICIES FOR BREXIT 24/09/19
INVITED AT AAC TECHNICAL COMMITTEE WHICH CONSULTS THE UK GOVERNMENT ABOUT THE TECHNICAL ISSUES OF THE THEME.
IT WAS PRESENTED OUR PROPOSAL AS IT CAN BE READ BY CLICKING ON THE TITLEs LINK.
BELOW WE PRESENT an article first posted on GR in October 2017 WHICH DESCRIBES THE SITUATION FROM ANOTHER POINT:
POLITAES,CITIZENS,METAPOLITANS,
READERS AND FOLLOWERS,CHAIRESTHAI,
THINGS ARE PROCEEDING WELL THANKS TO YOUR KINDNESS AND THE eCOWAVERS SUPPORT IF IT IS TAKEN OUT OF CONSIDERATION A VIOLENT ACT AGAINST THE WRITER OF THE TEXT BY SOMEBODY PAID FROM THOSE WHO DONT LIKE OUR IDEAS.
ENDING OUR INTERFERENCE WITH BREXIT IT SHOULD BE MENTIONED THAT THE PROPOSAL DONE FROM OUR PART WAS HEARD BY THE BRITISH DEEPER SOCIETY WHICH INVITED ME TWICE HERE IN BRUSSELS IN ORDER TO ANALYSE IT.
a)Exploring arrangements to avoid a hard Irish border after Brexit 11/07/19
AT A BROADER AUDIENCE WERE BRIEFLY MENTIONED OUR IDEAS:
A)5 YEARS DELAY AND AFTER NEW REFERENDUM B)NEW EUROPEAN CURRENCY ON PARALLEL WITH EURO C)UK TO ORGANISE WITH CONSILIUM THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE COMMUNITY
b) AT AAC MEETING EXPRESSING OUR SUGGESTED POLICIES FOR BREXIT 24/09/19
INVITED AT AAC TECHNICAL COMMITTEE WHICH CONSULTS THE UK GOVERNMENT ABOUT THE TECHNICAL ISSUES OF THE THEME.
IT WAS PRESENTED OUR PROPOSAL AS IT CAN BE READ BY CLICKING ON THE TITLEs LINK.
BELOW WE PRESENT an article first posted on GR in October 2017 WHICH DESCRIBES THE SITUATION FROM ANOTHER POINT:
In this truly alarming story I connect three significant articles to show that Brexit, far from being the result of representative democracy, is in fact a campaign of covert intervention by foreign billionaires to bring about economic chaos in Britain in order create the circumstances for making huge profits. This is not the stuff of mere conspiracy theories. Clear evidence has emerged that Brexit was engineered and is already proving to be a catastrophe, as confirmed by the mainstream media frenzy over Theresa May’s political mis-management of the greatest post-war challenge of our time.
In part-one (by left leaning, The Guardian newspaper) we see how Brexit really came about and who influenced it.
In part-two (by centre newspaper The Independent) we see how opaque and deceptive think tanks have heavily influenced Brexit and in part-three (by right leaning EUReferendum) we see that economic chaos is being planned in a post-Brexit era, who is involved and why.
These articles identify the actors behind the current attack on Britain and what has happened to date so far. At the end, the reader should get a sense of the impending disaster being constructed by the super-rich against the people of Britain purely for profit. Just as oil speculators pushed up global energy prices to $145 a barrel just prior to the financial crash in what was termed the London Loophole, and then profited from short bets on the way down – Britain is being set up for a fall where those with big money will ultimately clean up.
PART ONE: Carole Cadwalladr from The Guardian wrote a searing piece last May on what really happened in Britain’s EU referendum vote. Her first sentence led the reader into a 7,000 word setting of foreign actors and corporations intent on usurping democracy in Britain. “A shadowy global operation involving big data, billionaire friends of Trump and the disparate forces of the Leave campaign influenced the result of the EU referendum.” The article entitled “The Great British Brexit Robbery: How Our Democracy Was Highjacked” is now the subject of a bitter legal battle between the accused; Cambridge Analytica LLC and SCL Elections Limited and The Guardian newspaper. Several amendments to the article have been made since the original publication in a climate of legal threats. The stakes are very high just for reporting it.
The article went deeply into how technology and data was illegally used in Britain’s EU referendum voting process. One former employee of the main company involved, Cambridge Analytica, confirmed that they were using psychological operations – the same methods the military use to effect mass sentiment change. It’s what they mean by winning ‘hearts and minds’. “We were just doing it to win elections in the kind of developing countries that don’t have many rules.” Except they were doing it in Britain, and at a historical moment for its future.
As the reader continues, names like Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal, Facebook, Google, MI5 and other vested interests such as hedge funds and banks litter the story.
It is clear from Cadwalladr’s investigation that British democracy was subverted through a covert, far-reaching plan of coordination enabled by US billionaires and she shows how Britain is in the midst of a massive land grab for power by them. These determined individuals bypassed Britain’s electoral laws and swung the margins in favour to Brexit. She also highlights some political activities much closer to home – note the involvement of the DUP, now the balance of power in Theresa May’s government.
“Vote Leave (the official Leave campaign) chose to spend £3.9m, more than half its official £7m campaign budget. As did three other affiliated Leave campaigns: BeLeave, Veterans for Britain and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP), spending a further £757,750. “Coordination” between campaigns is prohibited under UK electoral law, unless campaign expenditure is declared, jointly. It wasn’t”.
The story gets darker as it accuses the British military-industrial complex, old-school Tories, a former parliamentary under-secretary of State for Defence procurement, director of Marconi Defence Systems, and David Cameron’s pro-Brexit former trade envoy – of involvement. Allegations are made that the head of psychological operations for British forces in Afghanistan are in on the game. One alarmingly frank quote says: “SCL/Cambridge Analytica was not some startup created by a couple of guys with a MacBook. It’s effectively part of the British defence establishment” using “military strategies on a civilian population.“
Data, algorithms, micro-ads, emotional manipulation, voter engagement/disengagement, and psyops strategies are just some of the buzz words in use to ensure enough votes go the right way. These strategies are all connected to names such as the aforementioned Cambridge Analytica, but also Robert Mercer, Steve Bannon, AggregateIQ, Leave.EU, Vote Leave, Nigel Farage, the DUP and big financial donors.
“We are in an information war and billionaires are buying up these companies, which are then employed to go to work in the heart of government. That’s a very worrying situation.”
David Miller, a professor of sociology at Bath University and an authority in psyops and propaganda, says it is “an extraordinary scandal that this should be anywhere near a democracy. It should be clear to voters where information is coming from, and if it’s not transparent or open where it’s coming from, it raises the question of whether we are actually living in a democracy or not.”
This all conjures up the characteristics of a great novel, a story that helped to bring about the biggest constitutional change to Britain in a century. In the end, the article concludes that “we, the British people, were played.”
This conclusion is best described by Cadwalladre’s final words.
“This is Britain in 2017. A Britain that increasingly looks like a “managed” democracy. Paid for by US billionaires. Using military-style technology. Delivered by Facebook. And enabled by us. If we let this referendum result stand, we are giving it our implicit consent. This isn’t about Remain or Leave. It goes far beyond party politics. It’s about the first step into a brave, new, increasingly undemocratic world.”
Unfortunately, Cadwalladr’s article is not a work of fiction or theory. And if you think that is depressing – that foreign billionaires can usurp Britain’s democracy at will, then it does in fact, get much worse, because obviously there must be reasons why so much time, effort and money has gone into such a dangerous high stakes game in the first place.
CONCERNING OUR PROPOSAL FOR
A)5 YEARS DELAY AND AFTERWARDS NEW REFERENDUM
A)5 YEARS DELAY AND AFTERWARDS NEW REFERENDUM
THIS WILL GIVE A COMPETATIVE ADVANTAGE TO THE UK CITIZENS BUT ALSO TO THE EUROPEANS&MEDITERRANEANS IF THEY FOLLOW OUR B)&C) PROPOSALS BY PRESSING THEIR OLIGARCHIC PARTY SYSTEM IN VARIOUS WAYS.
MEANWHILE SCOTLAND,WALLES&N.IRELAND MIGHT WORK ABOUT OUR MACRONATIONAL EUROPEAN PROPOSALS FOR A UNIFICATION AREA AT UK-IRELAND TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION AND THE MACROREGIONAL EU POLICIES.
MEANWHILE SCOTLAND,WALLES&N.IRELAND MIGHT WORK ABOUT OUR MACRONATIONAL EUROPEAN PROPOSALS FOR A UNIFICATION AREA AT UK-IRELAND TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION AND THE MACROREGIONAL EU POLICIES.
B)STUDIES ABOUT THE CREATION FOR A PARALLEL NOMISMA BASED ON THE CURRENCY BASKETS OF UK AND THESE COUNTRIES WHICH ARENT IN THE EUROGROUP OR THOSE WHICH WANT TO DEPART AS IT WAS SUGGESTED TO THE PREVIOUS ARTICLE with an advanced discussion for a third digital currency later on.A PARALLEL USE LATER ON INSIDE and or OUTSIDE EUROZONE COULD GIVE A COMPETATIVE ADVANTAGE TOTHE EUROPEAN&MEDITERRANEANTERRITORY OUT OF THE CONTROL OF N.Y. SYSTEM.
C)THE CREATION OF THE EUROPEAN DEFENSE COMMUNITY COULD PRESS THE EUNION IN ORDER TO BECOME LESS BUREAUCRATIC,MORE INNOVATIVE AND TO BE FOCUSED&BE EFFECTIVE TO THE eCONOMIC INTEGRATION FOR A HUGE AREA AS OURS IS COMBINED WITH THE NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICIES.
ON THE OTHER HAND THE DEFENSE WILL OFFER FLEXIBILITY TO OUR POLICIES AS EUROPEANS&MEDITERRANEANS BY THE PARTICIPATION OF COUNTRIES WHICH ARENT MEMBERS OF THE EUNION OFFERING ANOTHER CULTURAL ELEMENT APART FROM THE HOMO ECONOMICUS WHICH IS PRESENTED BY THE GLOBALISTS .
ON THE OTHER HAND THE DEFENSE WILL OFFER FLEXIBILITY TO OUR POLICIES AS EUROPEANS&MEDITERRANEANS BY THE PARTICIPATION OF COUNTRIES WHICH ARENT MEMBERS OF THE EUNION OFFERING ANOTHER CULTURAL ELEMENT APART FROM THE HOMO ECONOMICUS WHICH IS PRESENTED BY THE GLOBALISTS .
ALREADY THE EUROPEAN ADMINISTRATORS HAVE HEARD OUR CALL AND THEY ORGANISE THE European Intervention Initiative OUTSIDE THE Common Security and Defence Policy WHICH LATELY WAS MADE BY THE EU.THE UK IS A MEMBER OF THIS INITIATIVE WHICH CAN BE THE VEHICLE TOWARDS THE EUROPEAN DEFENSE COMMUNITY.THIS NEW ENTITY BEING GOVERNED BY AN ORGAN WHICH WILL BE A SYNTHESIS OF THE EU CONSILIUM,THE ABSORBED ENTITIES OF THE ORGANISATION OF SECURITY (EOS) PLUS THE COUNSIL OF EUROPE (COE) WILL PROTECT THE FOUNDING NATIONAL MEMBER STATES FROM THE DANGER WHICH DERIVES FROM THE EUNION REGIONAL POLICIES WHEN ALSO WILL BE ACHIEVED A COST DECREASE FROM THE OPERATION OF ALL THESE BUREAUCRATIC INSTITUTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE TAX PAYERS.
IT IS THOUGHT THAT THE UK DUE TO ITS ROLE DURING THE 2 WW IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF EUROPE AND THOSE POLITICIANS WHO ARE INFLUENCED FROM POLICIES COMING FROM THE EX COLONIES CANT WORK FOR BEING(making) THE BRITISH SUBJECTS PROTAGONISTS ONCE AGAIN.ON THE CONTRARY BY SUCH DEPENDANCIES THEY CONTINUE THE DECLINE OF THE GREAT BRITAIN AFTER 1950.
9
CONCLUDING IT IS BELIEVED THAT THESE 3 ARTICLES OF OURS ABOUT BREXIT WILL OFFER TO THE EUROPEAN&MEDITERRANEAN CITIZENS THE WAYS FOR OPENING A DIALOG WITH MORE REFERENDUMS IN ORDER EUROPE&MEDITERRANEAN TO BE ONE DAY AN INTEGRATED ZONE IN ECONOMY,DEFENSE&CULTURES.
THE EU AN ENTITY WHICH WAS ARCHITECTURED FROM THE MIDDLE OF 19TH CENTURY BY THE ESTABLISHMENT ON 1952 OF THE European Coal and Steel Community BASED ON MARSHALL PLAN FUNDS INVESTED BY THE USA ISNT OUR EUROPE BUT IS DESIGNED TO BE THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE A CHEAP IMITATION OF A RICH EX COLONY.
THIS EU MAINLY AN ECONOMIC UNION IS PART OF THE EUROPE&MEDI UNION WHICH WE THE eCOWAVERS ARE ENVISIONING.IT'S THE OLIGARCHIC PART OF THE GLOBAL ELITES&THEIR FOLLOWERS.
EUROPEANS&MEDITERRANEANS LETS FIGHT IN PEACE FOR A ZONE OF OUR DREAMS THAT ONE OF :
EUROPEANS&MEDITERRANEANS LETS FIGHT IN PEACE FOR A ZONE OF OUR DREAMS THAT ONE OF :
CITIZENS,PEOPLES,NATIONS
THANKS FOR SUPPORTING OUR POLICIES
Labels: policy
posted by The visioner @ 5:27 PM
0 comments
